Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Mounds View Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27123041002 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 3,370

Census tract 27123041002 covers part of Mounds View, MN, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,370. Cost burden runs 64% here against 47.3% across Ramsey County.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 12% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,308
Renter share32.3%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$105,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Mounds View
Very Low
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#120 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,082 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mounds View and the region

Centroid at 45.0978, -93.2179 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mounds View scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mounds View
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,204 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mounds View
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mounds View
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mounds View
6.2

How Mounds View compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mounds View risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0410024.3Mounds Viewparent city5.6Countyavg tract in county4.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 178Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 5.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.4%Peak (2012)
  • 29Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 27123041002
Filings climbed 142% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 105Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.91×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mounds View

Against the Ramsey County average of 5.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.3 points. Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is economic stress at 2/10.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally.

Court records carry 178 eviction filings across 7 observed years. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. Filings peaked in 2012 at 7.4% of renter households.

In a typical year about 5.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123041002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123041002?

Census tract 27123041002 in Mounds View scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123041002?

Median gross rent is $1,204/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123041002?

7.9% of residents in tract 27123041002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,370.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123041002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 43th, minority 61th, housing 57th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123041002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 178 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123041002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.02% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27123041002 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.91× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27123041002 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27123041002 compare to Mounds View overall?

Tract 27123041002 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Mounds View at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mounds View; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mounds View

Top eight tracts in Mounds View ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related