Skip to content
Sacred Heart, Minnesota eviction risk overview
City brief · 481 residents

Sacred Heart, MN Eviction Risk: LOW

Renville County · Population 481

In 2026
Risk score
3.5
LOW

37th percentile, Minnesota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Sacred Heart been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min2.7 Average3.3 Now3.5
4.4 2.7
Operator read

Market shape first: supply constraint scores 3/10, so re-letting takes real pricing work and vacancy is the lever that hurts. The legal overlay adds most cases here (4/10) resolve on the calendar, not in argument. Against #10 of 11 in the county that nets out to 3.5/10, Low, with the balance set more by economics than by statute.

What do renters in Sacred Heart earn, and what are they paying?

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Sacred Heart score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.1 Regional 4.1 State 4.3 Economic 5.5 Supply 3.0 Rent Control 3.5 Eviction 4.1 Tenant 4.0 Housing 5.8 3.5 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +41.4% (2024)
    4.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.1
  3. State political climate
    Minnesota legislature & governorship
    4.3
  4. Economic stress
    20.3% poverty · 0.6% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $692 average · 19.3% renters
    3.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.5% of income on rent
    3.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    90 days filing → judgment
    4.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    19.3% renters
    4.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacred Heart and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Sacred Heart sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Renville County
Very Low
#10 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 10th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 11 cities in Renville County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Minnesota
Low
#601 of 909 cities
Rank in state, 34th percentileLowHigh
#601 of 909 cities in Minnesota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sacred Heart risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.5Sacred HeartThis city3.9Countyavg in county4.5Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Minnesota landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Minnesota statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.5
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 90d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $692/mo. A contested eviction takes 90 days and costs $4,482–$8,723 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 19.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 481 residents, 19.3% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 20.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 4.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.1 and 4.1 (GOP margin +41.4% (2024)). State climate at 4.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.1, housing court bias 5.8, rent-control risk 3.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.9 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 3. The numbers behind those: 20.3% poverty, 0.6% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sacred Heart sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Minneapolis, MN · 94d · ~$7.4k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.6 Minneapolis St. Paul, MN · 91d · ~$7.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.5 St. Paul Rochester, MN · 92d · ~$6.7k all-in ($73/day) · score 4.3 Rochester Bloomington, MN · 86d · ~$7.9k all-in ($92/day) · score 4.4 Bloomington Duluth, MN · 101d · ~$7.3k all-in ($72/day) · score 4.3 Duluth Brooklyn Park, MN · 90d · ~$7.6k all-in ($85/day) · score 4.4 Brooklyn Park Plymouth, MN · 89d · ~$7.5k all-in ($84/day) · score 4 Plymouth Woodbury, MN · 92d · ~$7.4k all-in ($81/day) · score 4 Woodbury Lakeville, MN · 97d · ~$8.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 4 Lakeville Blaine, MN · 85d · ~$7.6k all-in ($90/day) · score 4 Blaine Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sacred Heart
Sacred Heart · 90d · ~$6.6k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sacred Heart, MN

Landlording in Sacred Heart, Minnesota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.5/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sacred Heart is a city of 481 residents where 19.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $692/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sacred Heart eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sacred Heart closes 90 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sacred Heart's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sacred Heart runs $4,482 to $8,723 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 90 days of typical timeline and $692/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4/10 in Sacred Heart, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Minnesota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sacred Heart: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Minnesota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $8,723 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sacred Heart

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
For landlords, the 3.5/10 score is most actionable when combined with Chippewa County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 5.8/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 2,011 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 1.03× the historical baseline (near baseline). Past 12 months: 26,070 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 113,788.

  • 2,011Past month
  • 26,070Past 12 months
  • 1.03×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 11.5%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: no advance notice (in the case of nonpayment of rent). Filing fee: minimum filing fee of $310.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is "source-of-income protection" and how does it affect me in Sacred Heart?

Source-of-income protection in Minnesota means you cannot refuse to rent to someone simply because they use a housing voucher, Section 8, or other public assistance to pay their rent. You still screen them based on other criteria like credit, rental history, and background checks, but their income source itself cannot be the reason for denial.

Q2

Can I charge a late fee in Sacred Heart?

Yes, you can charge late fees. Make sure the late fee amount and when it applies are clearly spelled out in your lease agreement. Minnesota law doesn't specify a maximum late fee, but it must be reasonable and reflect your actual costs incurred by late payment, not act as a penalty.

Q3

How long does it typically take to get a tenant out once I file in court?

After you file in court, the process can still take several weeks. With the 14-day notice period and court scheduling, the typical total timeline from the first notice to a final sheriff lockout is about 90 days in Minnesota. This isn't a quick fix.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Sacred Heart?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in Minnesota. However, the process has strict rules and deadlines. Many landlords find that hiring an attorney for at least the court filing and hearing phases saves them time, prevents costly mistakes, and increases their chances of a successful outcome. It's often worth the investment, especially given the complexity of the Minnesota eviction process.

Q5

Can I change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings without a court order is illegal and constitutes a "self-help eviction" in Minnesota. This can lead to serious penalties, including financial damages awarded to the tenant. You must follow the formal eviction process through the courts.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.5/10 places Sacred Heart in the 37th percentile of Minnesota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.