Skip to content
Toomsuba, Mississippi eviction risk overview
City brief · 512 residents

Toomsuba, MS Eviction Risk: LOW

Lauderdale County · Population 512

In 2026
Risk score
2.7
LOW

84th percentile, Mississippi.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.6 Now2.7
3.4 2.1 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.8 1981 · score 2.9 1982 · score 3.0 1983 · score 2.9 1984 · score 2.9 1985 · score 2.8 1986 · score 2.8 1987 · score 2.7 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.3 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.4 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.3 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.7 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.6 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.2 2021 · score 3.4 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.7 2025 · score 2.7 2026 · score 2.7

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.8 Regional 4.8 State 1.8 Economic 8.9 Supply 8.6 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.3 Tenant 8.6 Housing 1.1 2.7 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +21.2% (2024)
    4.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.8
  3. State political climate
    Mississippi legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    20.0% poverty · 27.8% unemp.
    8.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $930 average · 52.6% renters
    8.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.9% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    27 days filing → judgment
    1.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    52.6% renters
    8.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Toomsuba and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Toomsuba compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Lauderdale County
Elevated
#3 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 cities in Lauderdale County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Mississippi
High
#96 of 426 cities
Rank in state, 78th percentileLowHigh
#96 of 426 cities in Mississippi for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Toomsuba risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Toomsuba: 2.72.7ToomsubaThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.7
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 27d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $930/mo. A contested eviction takes 27 days and costs $881–$2,791 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 52.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 512 residents, 52.6% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 20.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.8 and 4.8 (GOP margin +21.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 1.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.9. Supply constraint: 8.6. The numbers behind those: 20.0% poverty, 27.8% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Toomsuba sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Jackson, MS · 28d · ~$1.7k all-in ($59/day) · score 3.4 Jackson Gulfport, MS · 27d · ~$1.7k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.8 Gulfport Southaven, MS · 28d · ~$1.9k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.2 Southaven Mobile, AL · 30d · ~$1.9k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.8 Mobile Birmingham, AL · 32d · ~$1.7k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.9 Birmingham Montgomery, AL · 28d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.8 Montgomery Tuscaloosa, AL · 28d · ~$1.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.8 Tuscaloosa Hoover, AL · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.2 Hoover Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Toomsuba
Toomsuba · 27d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Toomsuba, MS

Landlording in Toomsuba, Mississippi, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Toomsuba is a city of 512 residents where 52.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $930/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Toomsuba eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Toomsuba closes 27 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Toomsuba's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Toomsuba runs $881 to $2,791 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 27 days of typical timeline and $930/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.6/10 in Toomsuba, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Mississippi, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Toomsuba: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Mississippi's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,791 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Toomsuba

Trap · MISSISSIPPI
For state-level context, see the Mississippi overview link in the guides section below. The score combines political climate, rent-to-income ratio, court bias, and tenant organizing strength under Miss. Code 89-8.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Toomsuba without a reason?

Yes, for month-to-month leases or after a fixed-term lease expires, you can typically terminate the tenancy with a 30-day notice without needing a "just cause." Mississippi does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement. However, you cannot evict for discriminatory reasons or in retaliation for the tenant exercising their legal rights.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after an eviction judgment?

After a judge rules in your favor for possession, the tenant is typically given a short period, often a few days, to vacate voluntarily. If they don't, you must obtain a writ of possession from the court. This writ authorizes the sheriff to remove the tenant and their belongings. You should never attempt to remove a tenant yourself.

Q3

Is there rent control in Toomsuba, MS?

No, there is no rent control in Toomsuba or anywhere else in Mississippi. Landlords are generally free to set rent prices and increase them with proper notice, typically 30 days for month-to-month tenancies. For more details, refer to our Mississippi rent control rules page.

Q4

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. You can only deduct from the security deposit for actual damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or other breaches of the lease agreement. "Normal wear and tear" includes things like faded paint, minor scuffs, or worn carpet. Excessive damage, like large holes in walls or broken fixtures, is generally deductible. Make sure to document the condition of the property before and after the tenancy with photos or videos.

Q5

What if the tenant abandons the property?

If a tenant abandons the property (e.g., moves out without notice, stops paying rent, and removes all belongings), you may be able to regain possession more quickly. However, you must be careful not to illegally evict. Generally, you need clear evidence of abandonment. It's often best to send a notice of abandonment and wait a specific period (check with a local attorney for specifics) before taking possession. If you're unsure, pursuing a standard eviction is safer to avoid legal trouble.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.7/10 places Toomsuba in the 84th percentile of Mississippi cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.