Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Floral Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Butte

Tract 30093000500 · Silver Bow County, MT · pop 4,859 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 30093000500 covers part of the Floral Park area of Butte, MT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,859. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 10% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,859
Renter share18.6%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$70,585

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Floral Park
Very High
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Butte
Low
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Silver Bow County
Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#232 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Butte and the region

Centroid at 45.9877, -112.4940 · click any tract to drill in

Why Floral Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Butte
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$879 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Butte
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Butte
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Butte
6.7

How Floral Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Floral Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0005003.7Butteparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Floral Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Floral Park

The main counterweight is eviction-process difficulty at 1.4/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.7/10.

Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 41.1% across Silver Bow County. SNAP participation runs 7.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Silver Bow County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 19% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $70,585, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $879, close to the Butte average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 30093000500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30093000500?

Census tract 30093000500 in the Floral Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30093000500?

Median gross rent is $879/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30093000500?

11.7% of residents in tract 30093000500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,859.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30093000500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 89th, minority 18th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 30093000500 considered part of Floral Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30093000500 fall within Floral Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30093000500 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30093000500 compare to Butte overall?

Tract 30093000500 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Butte at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Butte eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Butte

Top eight tracts in Butte ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related