Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Floral Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Butte

Tract 30093000700 · Silver Bow County, MT · pop 3,399 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 30093000700 sits in the Floral Park area of Butte eviction risk, MT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 3,399 residents. Against Silver Bow County at 41.1%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 10% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,480
Renter share24.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$81,944

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Floral Park
Very Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Butte
Low
Within county
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Silver Bow County
Very Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#232 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Butte and the region

Centroid at 45.9718, -112.4894 · click any tract to drill in

Why Floral Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Butte
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,060 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Butte
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Butte
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Butte
6.7

How Floral Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Floral Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0007003.7Butteparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Floral Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Floral Park

The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.7/10. At $1,060 a month, rents run 24% over what the rest of Butte commands. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Silver Bow County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Housing insecurity runs 6.7% against 14.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $81,944, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 30093000700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30093000700?

Census tract 30093000700 in the Floral Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30093000700?

Median gross rent is $1,060/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30093000700?

4.3% of residents in tract 30093000700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,399.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30093000700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 27th, minority 4th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 30093000700 considered part of Floral Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30093000700 fall within Floral Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30093000700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30093000700 compare to Butte overall?

Tract 30093000700 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Butte at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Butte eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Butte

Top eight tracts in Butte ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related