Floral Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Butte
Tract 30093000700 · Silver Bow County, MT · pop 3,399 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Tract 30093000700 sits in the Floral Park area of Butte eviction risk, MT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 3,399 residents. Against Silver Bow County at 41.1%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Butte and the region
Centroid at 45.9718, -112.4894 · click any tract to drill in
Why Floral Park scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Floral Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 16%Socioeconomic
- 27%Household composition
- 4%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Floral Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.7%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.1%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 32.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Floral Park
The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.7/10. At $1,060 a month, rents run 24% over what the rest of Butte commands. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Against the Silver Bow County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Housing insecurity runs 6.7% against 14.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $81,944, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 30093000700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30093000700?
What is the average rent in tract 30093000700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 30093000700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 30093000700?
Is tract 30093000700 considered part of Floral Park?
What share of households in tract 30093000700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 30093000700 compare to Butte overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Butte
Top eight tracts in Butte ranked by composite eviction-risk score.