Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Floral Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Butte

Tract 30093000500 · Silver Bow County, MT · pop 4,859 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 30093000500 covers Floral Park in Butte-Silver Bow (balance), home to 4,859 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #51,796 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

47% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $879 a month while the average household earns $70,585 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 10% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,859
Renter share18.6%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$70,585

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Floral Park
Very High
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Butte
Low
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Silver Bow County
Low
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#144 of 319 tracts In Montana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Butte and the region

Centroid at 45.9877, -112.4940 · click any tract to drill in

Why Floral Park scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Butte
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$879 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Butte
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Butte
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Butte
6.7

How Floral Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Floral Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 000500Butte: 2.32.3Butteparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Floral Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Floral Park

The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Butte eviction risk-Silver Bow (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Silver Bow County average of 4.9 and above the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 30093000500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30093000500?

Census tract 30093000500 in the Floral Park neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30093000500?

Median gross rent is $879/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30093000500?

11.7% of residents in tract 30093000500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,859.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30093000500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 89th, minority 18th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 30093000500 considered part of Floral Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30093000500 fall within Floral Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30093000500 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30093000500 compare to Butte overall?

Tract 30093000500 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Butte at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Butte eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Butte

Top eight tracts in Butte ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related