Skip to content
Hartington, Nebraska eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,621 residents

Hartington, NE Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cedar County · Population 1,621

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

20th percentile, Nebraska.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.2 Now2.3
3.7 1.9 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 1.9 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.0 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 1.9 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.1 2001 · score 2.2 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.6 2011 · score 2.6 2012 · score 2.5 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.4 2021 · score 3.7 2022 · score 2.8 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.4 Regional 2.4 State 1.8 Economic 3.1 Supply 3.6 Rent Control 1.7 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 4.9 Housing 2.3 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +70.0% (2024)
    2.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.4
  3. State political climate
    Nebraska legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    4.5% poverty · 1.1% unemp.
    3.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $640 average · 16.7% renters
    3.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.6% of income on rent
    1.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    27 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    16.7% renters
    4.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hartington and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Hartington compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cedar County
Very Low
#9 of 10 cities
Rank in county, 11th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 10 cities in Cedar County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Nebraska
Very Low
#505 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 15th percentileLowHigh
#505 of 593 cities in Nebraska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Hartington risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Hartington: 2.32.3HartingtonThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.92.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 27d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $640/mo. A contested eviction takes 27 days and costs $1,145–$3,174 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 16.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,621 residents, 16.7% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.4 and 2.4 (GOP margin +70.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 2.3, rent-control risk 1.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.1. Supply constraint: 3.6. The numbers behind those: 4.5% poverty, 1.1% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Hartington sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Omaha, NE · 32d · ~$2.0k all-in ($63/day) · score 3.2 Omaha Lincoln, NE · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 3.1 Lincoln Bellevue, NE · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.9 Bellevue Grand Island, NE · 29d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 3 Grand Island Sioux Falls, SD · 21d · ~$1.6k all-in ($77/day) · score 1.7 Sioux Falls Sioux City, IA · 47d · ~$2.7k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.5 Sioux City Council Bluffs, IA · 41d · ~$3.0k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.6 Council Bluffs Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Hartington
Hartington · 27d · ~$2.2k all-in ($80/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Hartington, NE

Landlording in Hartington, Nebraska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Hartington is a city of 1,621 residents where 16.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $640/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Hartington eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Hartington closes 27 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Hartington's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Hartington runs $1,145 to $3,174 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 27 days of typical timeline and $640/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.9/10 in Hartington, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Nebraska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Hartington: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Nebraska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,174 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Hartington

Trap · 1.7/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Hartington's 1.9/10 is below the Nebraska state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 1.7/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

How long does an eviction typically take in Hartington?

The typical eviction timeline in Hartington, NE is about 27 days from the time you serve the initial notice to when you can regain possession of your property. This can vary based on court availability and whether the tenant contests the eviction.

Q2

What's the most common mistake landlords make during eviction?

The most common mistake is improper notice. Either serving it incorrectly, not waiting the full notice period, or using the wrong type of notice. Any of these can lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to restart the entire process and incur more costs and lost rent. Also, never attempt self-help evictions.

Q3

Can I charge late fees in Hartington?

Yes, you can charge reasonable late fees as long as they are clearly outlined in your lease agreement. Nebraska law doesn't specify a maximum late fee amount, but courts generally consider fees that are excessive or penalizing to be unenforceable. Stick to a percentage (e.g., 5%) or a reasonable flat fee per day.

Q4

Is there rent control in Hartington, NE?

No, there is no rent control in Hartington or anywhere in Nebraska. The state has preempted local governments from enacting rent control measures. This means you are generally free to set rent prices as you see fit, subject to market conditions. More details can be found on our Nebraska rent control rules page.

Q5

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the court grants the eviction?

If the court grants you possession and the tenant still refuses to leave, you will need to involve the Cedar County Sheriff's office to physically remove them. Do not attempt to remove them yourself. The Sheriff will serve a writ of restitution and schedule a lockout. This is the final step in the legal eviction process.

Q6

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Hartington?

While you can technically represent yourself in Nebraska county court for an eviction, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially for your first eviction or if the case is complex. An attorney ensures proper procedure, saving you time and potential legal pitfalls. For Cedar County specifics, check our Cedar County eviction guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Hartington in the 20th percentile of Nebraska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.