Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,146 of 84,120 nationally

Singing Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sparks

Tract 32031003521 · Washoe, NV · pop 3,057 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 32031003521 sits in the Singing Hills neighborhood of Sparks, Nevada. It has a population of 3,057 and an eviction-risk score of 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). 69% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 20% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,973/month against a median household income of $75,370 — roughly 31% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 15% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,156
Renter share46.9%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$75,370

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In Singing Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank — 60th percentileBottomTop
#11 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Elevated
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank — 44th percentileBottomTop
#79 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Moderate
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank — 17th percentileBottomTop
#644 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5931, -119.7225 · click any tract to drill in

Why Singing Hills scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,973 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Singing Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Singing Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 003521Sparks: 3.83.8Sparksparent cityCounty: 4.94.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031003521

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031003521?

Census tract 32031003521 in the Singing Hills neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031003521?

Median gross rent is $1,973/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031003521?

5.7% of residents in tract 32031003521 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,057.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031003521?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 84th, minority 60th, housing 16th.

Q5

Is tract 32031003521 considered part of Singing Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031003521 fall within Singing Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).

Q6

What share of households in tract 32031003521 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 32031003521 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031003521 scores 4.8/10 — higher than the parent city of Sparks at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related