Within neighborhood
93
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally
The Shades Eviction Risk: High , Union City
Tract 34017014900 · Hudson County, NJ · pop 3,057 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 34017014900 covers part of the The Shades area of Hudson County, NJ, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,057 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 8.3/10.
Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units982
Renter share46.0%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate22.6%
Median income$75,104
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
80
th percentile
High
Within state
89
th percentile
High
National
94
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Union City and the region
Centroid at 40.7601, -74.0475 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Shades scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Union City
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.6% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,712 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union City
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union City
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union City
5.0
How The Shades compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 87%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 99%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 96Total filings over 4 yrs
- 4.72%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.9%Peak (2014)
- 17Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 55% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within The Shades. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.1%Housing insecurity
- 11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 31.1%Food insecurity
- 18.7%SNAP enrollment
- 13.6%Transit barriers
- 24.9%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 33.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Shades
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Cost burden runs 55% here against 46.5% across Hudson County. Food insecurity runs 31.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.4/10. The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the Hudson County average of 7.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.
Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.3/10. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 96 filings here across 4 tracked years.
Housing insecurity runs 22.1% against 14.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2014, when 7.9% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 4.7% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #4,888 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34017014900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34017014900?
Census tract 34017014900 in the The Shades neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34017014900?
Median gross rent is $1,712/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34017014900?
22.6% of residents in tract 34017014900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,057.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34017014900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 82th, minority 87th, housing 49th.
Q5
Is tract 34017014900 considered part of The Shades?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34017014900 fall within The Shades (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34017014900?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 96 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34017014900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.72% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34017014900 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34017014900 compare to Union City overall?
Tract 34017014900 scores 8.7/10, higher than the parent city of Union City at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34017014900 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related