Witherspoon-Jackson Eviction Risk: Moderate

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.6/10. The voucher gap is 24.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.

On the softer side is economic stress, at 1.8/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. The 3 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 5.3 to 6.4, a 1.1-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address.

Disability prevalence reaches 16.9% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute. SNAP participation is 3.4% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

Court records carry 291 eviction filings across its 2 observed tracts. Running hot is supply constraint at 7.2/10.

Filing activity peaked in 2016 at 3.5% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 1.7% in 2018, is well off that peak.

Among the 5 mapped neighborhoods of Princeton, it ranks #3 by risk, the middle third. The closest comparables inside the same city are Institute Area and Pretty Brook Area.

Underwrite the address, not the area: with 1.1 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.