Skip to content
Las Palomas, New Mexico eviction risk overview
City brief · 304 residents

Las Palomas, NM Eviction Risk: LOW

Sierra County · Population 304

In 2026
Risk score
2.9
LOW

10th percentile, New Mexico.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.3 Now2.9
4.5 1.4 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.1 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.0 2002 · score 2.0 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.7 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 3.0 2011 · score 3.1 2012 · score 3.0 2013 · score 2.9 2014 · score 2.9 2015 · score 2.9 2016 · score 2.9 2017 · score 2.9 2018 · score 2.9 2019 · score 3.0 2020 · score 4.2 2021 · score 4.5 2022 · score 3.5 2023 · score 3.3 2024 · score 3.1 2025 · score 3.0 2026 · score 2.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 3.9 Economic 1.0 Supply 4.5 Rent Control 2.5 Eviction 4.0 Tenant 4.5 Housing 3.0 2.9 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +19.2% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    New Mexico legislature & governorship
    3.9
  4. Economic stress
    29.6% poverty · 4.5% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $734 average · 20.8% renters
    4.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.4% of income on rent
    2.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    81 days filing → judgment
    4.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    20.8% renters
    4.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Las Palomas and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Las Palomas compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Sierra County
Very Low
#12 of 12 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 12 cities in Sierra County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in New Mexico
Very Low
#480 of 518 cities
Rank in state, 7th percentileLowHigh
#480 of 518 cities in New Mexico for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Las Palomas risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Las Palomas: 2.92.9Las PalomasThis cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.9
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 81d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $734/mo. A contested eviction takes 81 days and costs $2,605–$8,352 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 20.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 304 residents, 20.8% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 29.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +19.2% (2024)). State climate at 3.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4, housing court bias 3, rent-control risk 2.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 4.5. The numbers behind those: 29.6% poverty, 4.5% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Las Palomas sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Las Palomas, NM

Landlording in Las Palomas, New Mexico, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.9/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Las Palomas is a city of 304 residents where 20.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.4% of income on rent. At an average rent of $734/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Las Palomas eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Las Palomas closes 81 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Las Palomas's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Las Palomas runs $2,605 to $8,352 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 81 days of typical timeline and $734/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.5/10 in Las Palomas, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In New Mexico, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Las Palomas: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match New Mexico's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $8,352 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Las Palomas

Trap · NEW MEXICO
For state-level context, see the New Mexico overview link in the guides section below. The score combines political climate, rent-to-income ratio, court bias, and tenant organizing strength under NMSA 47-8 UORRA.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,016 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.91× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 12,651 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 74,831.

  • 1,016Past month
  • 12,651Past 12 months
  • 0.91×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 21.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least three days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: minimum filing fee of $77 (depending on the court level).
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 1,392 filings (1.10× hist)2023-06-01: 1,349 filings (1.07× hist)2023-07-01: 1,274 filings (1.01× hist)2023-08-01: 1,498 filings (1.04× hist)2023-09-01: 1,296 filings (1.02× hist)2023-10-01: 1,389 filings (1.05× hist)2023-11-01: 1,118 filings (1.00× hist)2023-12-01: 1,259 filings (1.05× hist)2024-01-01: 1,222 filings (0.96× hist)2024-02-01: 1,110 filings (0.96× hist)2024-03-01: 962 filings (0.86× hist)2024-04-01: 1,039 filings (0.93× hist)2024-05-01: 1,143 filings (0.90× hist)2024-06-01: 1,179 filings (0.93× hist)2024-07-01: 1,240 filings (0.99× hist)2024-08-01: 1,375 filings (0.96× hist)2024-09-01: 1,252 filings (0.98× hist)2024-10-01: 1,265 filings (0.95× hist)2024-11-01: 1,114 filings (1.00× hist)2024-12-01: 1,145 filings (0.95× hist)2025-01-01: 1,283 filings (1.01× hist)2025-02-01: 1,009 filings (0.88× hist)2025-03-01: 958 filings (0.86× hist)2025-04-01: 1,015 filings (0.91× hist)2025-05-01: 966 filings (0.76× hist)2025-06-01: 1,010 filings (0.80× hist)2025-07-01: 1,100 filings (0.88× hist)2025-08-01: 1,078 filings (0.75× hist)2025-09-01: 1,219 filings (0.96× hist)2025-10-01: 1,114 filings (0.84× hist)2025-11-01: 981 filings (0.88× hist)2025-12-01: 1,046 filings (0.87× hist)2026-01-01: 1,127 filings (0.89× hist)2026-02-01: 1,026 filings (0.89× hist)2026-03-01: 968 filings (0.86× hist)2026-04-01: 1,016 filings (0.91× hist)
Filings climbed 5% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Las Palomas without a reason?

Yes, for month-to-month tenancies, New Mexico law allows you to terminate the tenancy with a 30-day written no-cause notice. However, you cannot use this notice as retaliation or during an active eviction process for other reasons.

Q2

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Las Palomas?

The fastest legal way is to immediately issue a 3-day pay-or-quit notice once rent is late, then file for eviction in Magistrate Court as soon as the notice period expires without payment. "Cash for keys" can sometimes be faster than court, if the tenant agrees.

Q3

How much can I charge for a security deposit in Las Palomas?

In New Mexico, the maximum security deposit you can charge is one month's rent. There are no exceptions to this cap, regardless of pet ownership or other factors. See New Mexico security deposit rules for details.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Las Palomas?

While you can represent yourself in Magistrate Court, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney. Eviction law is complex, and even small procedural errors can lead to case dismissal and costly delays. Given the typical eviction cost range, an attorney often saves you money in the long run.

Q5

What if my tenant damages the property beyond the security deposit?

If the cost of damages exceeds the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court (or Magistrate Court, depending on the amount) for the additional amount. You'll need clear documentation, including photos and repair estimates, to support your claim.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.9/10 places Las Palomas in the 10th percentile of New Mexico cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.