Skip to content
Taos Pueblo, New Mexico eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,129 residents

Taos Pueblo, NM Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Taos County · Population 1,129

In 2026
Risk score
4
MODERATE

99th percentile, New Mexico.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.6 Now4
4.1 1.9 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 2.2 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 2.0 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.5 1994 · score 2.5 1995 · score 2.6 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.8 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.8 2016 · score 2.8 2017 · score 2.7 2018 · score 2.7 2019 · score 2.7 2020 · score 3.9 2021 · score 4.1 2022 · score 3.2 2023 · score 3.0 2024 · score 3.9 2025 · score 4.0 2026 · score 4.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.0 Regional 8.0 State 3.9 Economic 9.7 Supply 6.5 Rent Control 4.8 Eviction 4.1 Tenant 6.3 Housing 7.2 4 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +47.5% (2024)
    8.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.0
  3. State political climate
    New Mexico legislature & governorship
    3.9
  4. Economic stress
    48.0% poverty · 17.9% unemp.
    9.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,125 average · 11.7% renters
    6.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.5% of income on rent
    4.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    78 days filing → judgment
    4.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    11.7% renters
    6.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Taos Pueblo and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Taos Pueblo compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Taos County
Very High
#1 of 19 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 19 cities in Taos County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in New Mexico
Very High
#24 of 518 cities
Rank in state, 96th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 518 cities in New Mexico for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Taos Pueblo risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Taos Pueblo: 4.04.0Taos PuebloThis cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 78d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,125/mo. A contested eviction takes 78 days and costs $3,198–$7,239 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 11.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,129 residents, 11.7% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 48.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8 and 8 (Dem margin +47.5% (2024)). State climate at 3.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.1, housing court bias 7.2, rent-control risk 4.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9.7. Supply constraint: 6.5. The numbers behind those: 48.0% poverty, 17.9% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Taos Pueblo sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Taos Pueblo, NM

Landlording in Taos Pueblo, New Mexico, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Taos Pueblo is a city of 1,129 residents where 11.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,125/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Taos Pueblo eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Taos Pueblo closes 78 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Taos Pueblo's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Taos Pueblo runs $3,198 to $7,239 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 78 days of typical timeline and $1,125/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.3/10 in Taos Pueblo, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In New Mexico, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Taos Pueblo: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match New Mexico's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $7,239 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Taos Pueblo

Trap · 4.8/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Taos Pueblo's 5.4/10 is near the New Mexico state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 4.8/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,016 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.91× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 12,651 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 74,831.

  • 1,016Past month
  • 12,651Past 12 months
  • 0.91×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 21.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least three days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: minimum filing fee of $77 (depending on the court level).
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 1,392 filings (1.10× hist)2023-06-01: 1,349 filings (1.07× hist)2023-07-01: 1,274 filings (1.01× hist)2023-08-01: 1,498 filings (1.04× hist)2023-09-01: 1,296 filings (1.02× hist)2023-10-01: 1,389 filings (1.05× hist)2023-11-01: 1,118 filings (1.00× hist)2023-12-01: 1,259 filings (1.05× hist)2024-01-01: 1,222 filings (0.96× hist)2024-02-01: 1,110 filings (0.96× hist)2024-03-01: 962 filings (0.86× hist)2024-04-01: 1,039 filings (0.93× hist)2024-05-01: 1,143 filings (0.90× hist)2024-06-01: 1,179 filings (0.93× hist)2024-07-01: 1,240 filings (0.99× hist)2024-08-01: 1,375 filings (0.96× hist)2024-09-01: 1,252 filings (0.98× hist)2024-10-01: 1,265 filings (0.95× hist)2024-11-01: 1,114 filings (1.00× hist)2024-12-01: 1,145 filings (0.95× hist)2025-01-01: 1,283 filings (1.01× hist)2025-02-01: 1,009 filings (0.88× hist)2025-03-01: 958 filings (0.86× hist)2025-04-01: 1,015 filings (0.91× hist)2025-05-01: 966 filings (0.76× hist)2025-06-01: 1,010 filings (0.80× hist)2025-07-01: 1,100 filings (0.88× hist)2025-08-01: 1,078 filings (0.75× hist)2025-09-01: 1,219 filings (0.96× hist)2025-10-01: 1,114 filings (0.84× hist)2025-11-01: 981 filings (0.88× hist)2025-12-01: 1,046 filings (0.87× hist)2026-01-01: 1,127 filings (0.89× hist)2026-02-01: 1,026 filings (0.89× hist)2026-03-01: 968 filings (0.86× hist)2026-04-01: 1,016 filings (0.91× hist)
Filings climbed 5% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the most common reason evictions fail in New Mexico?

The most common reason evictions fail is landlords making procedural errors, such as incorrect notice periods, improper service of notices, or failing to follow the exact steps outlined in NMSA § 47-8. Self-help evictions are also a guaranteed way to lose your case and face penalties.

Q2

Can I charge a late fee for rent in Taos Pueblo?

Yes, you can charge a late fee, but it must be reasonable and clearly stated in your lease agreement. New Mexico law does not specify a maximum late fee amount, but courts generally consider fees between 5-10% of the monthly rent to be reasonable.

Q3

Is there rent control in Taos Pueblo or New Mexico?

No, there is no statewide rent control in New Mexico, and Taos Pueblo does not have its own local rent control ordinances. Our New Mexico rent control rules guide confirms this. This means you generally have flexibility in setting and raising rents, subject to proper notice periods for increases.

Q4

How long does it take for the sheriff to remove a tenant after a Writ of Restitution?

Once a judge issues a Writ of Restitution, the sheriff typically serves it within a few days, giving the tenant a final chance to vacate, often 24-72 hours. After that period, the sheriff will physically remove the tenant if they haven't left. The exact timing can depend on the sheriff's department's workload.

Q5

Can I screen tenants based on their source of income?

New Mexico does not have a statewide source-of-income protection law. This means, generally, you can consider a tenant's source of income (e.g., employment, disability benefits, housing vouchers) when making a rental decision. However, always consult with an attorney to ensure compliance with fair housing laws and any potential local ordinances that may apply.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4/10 places Taos Pueblo in the 99th percentile of New Mexico cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.