Commack Eviction Risk: Moderate

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Cost burden runs 43% here against 51.3% across Suffolk County.

Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.3/10. Food insecurity runs 8.0% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally.

That is riskier than roughly 74% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 4% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Suffolk County average of 6.3 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.