Census Tract · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally
Bolivia Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 37019020603 ·
Brunswick County, NC · pop 3,470 · 6% of tract blocks fall in Bolivia
Bolivia in Brunswick County anchors census tract 37019020603, which lands at 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 71% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 60% of renter households, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,345 a month against an average household income of $63,859 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 8%Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,343
Renter share20.8%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate21.5%
Median income$63,859
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Bolivia
Moderate
Within county
91th percentile
#5 of 43 tracts In Brunswick County
Very High
Within state
52th percentile
#1,266 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
National
47th percentile
#44,543 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bolivia and the region
Centroid at 34.0182, -78.1976 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bolivia scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bolivia
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
21.5% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,345 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bolivia
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bolivia
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bolivia
6.5
How Bolivia compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
73%Socioeconomic
16%Household composition
46%Racial/ethnic minority
52%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.9%Housing insecurity
10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
19.2%Food insecurity
17.6%SNAP enrollment
9.9%Transit barriers
11.5%No health insurance
17.4%Frequent mental distress
38.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bolivia
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bolivia, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Brunswick County average of 4.9 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 55 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 5.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.1% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37019020603
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37019020603?
Census tract 37019020603 in Bolivia scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37019020603?
Median gross rent is $1,345/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37019020603?
21.5% of residents in tract 37019020603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,470.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37019020603?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 16th, minority 46th, housing 52th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37019020603?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 37019020603 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.45% of renter households, peaking at 11.1% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 37019020603 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 37019020603 compare to Bolivia overall?
Tract 37019020603 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Bolivia at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bolivia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.