Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Robinhood Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Winston-Salem

Tract 37067003908 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 3,683 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 37067003908 sits in the Robinhood Park area of Winston-Salem eviction risk, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 3,683. Severe burden reaches 43%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 5% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,243
Renter share9.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate1.6%
Median income$146,655

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Robinhood Park
Very Low
Within parent city
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 65 tracts In Winston-Salem
Very Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 95 tracts In Forsyth County
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,927 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Winston-Salem and the region

Centroid at 36.1127, -80.3368 · click any tract to drill in

Why Robinhood Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Winston-Salem
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
1.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,771 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Winston-Salem
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5

How Robinhood Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Robinhood Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0039083.6Winston-Salemparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 15Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.86%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.2%Peak (2012)
  • 6Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37067003908
Filings climbed 100% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Robinhood Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Robinhood Park

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. Average gross rent is $1,771, 63% above the Winston-Salem average.

The voucher gap is 52.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 9.5/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Forsyth County average of 41.1%. SNAP participation runs 3.5% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 0.9 points below the Forsyth County average of 3.9. The filing record is not thin: 15 evictions over 4 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2012, when 12.2% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 37067003908

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067003908?

Census tract 37067003908 in the Robinhood Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37067003908?

Median gross rent is $1,771/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37067003908?

1.6% of residents in tract 37067003908 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,683.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37067003908?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 23th, minority 23th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 37067003908 considered part of Robinhood Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37067003908 fall within Robinhood Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067003908?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 15 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067003908 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.86% of renter households, peaking at 12.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37067003908 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37067003908 compare to Winston-Salem overall?

Tract 37067003908 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Winston-Salem at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Winston-Salem eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Winston-Salem

Top eight tracts in Winston-Salem ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related