Skip to content
Mountain, North Dakota eviction risk overview
City brief · 100 residents

Mountain, ND Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Pembina County · Population 100

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

92th percentile, North Dakota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.7 Now2.3
3.3 2.1 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 2.9 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.1 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.0 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.4 2006 · score 2.3 2007 · score 2.3 2008 · score 3.0 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.6 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.4 2023 · score 2.1 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.2 Regional 3.2 State 1.5 Economic 6.9 Supply 5.2 Rent Control 9.6 Eviction 1.2 Tenant 7.6 Housing 7.1 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +53.3% (2024)
    3.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.2
  3. State political climate
    North Dakota legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    8.3% poverty · 13.3% unemp.
    6.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $694 average · 35.0% renters
    5.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    25.0% of income on rent
    9.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    18 days filing → judgment
    1.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    35.0% renters
    7.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mountain and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Mountain compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pembina County
Very High
#2 of 12 cities
Rank in county, 91st percentileLowHigh
#2 of 12 cities in Pembina County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in North Dakota
Very High
#39 of 406 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileLowHigh
#39 of 406 cities in North Dakota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Mountain risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Mountain: 2.32.3MountainThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 1.81.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 18d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $694/mo. A contested eviction takes 18 days and costs $738–$2,794 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 35.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 100 residents, 35.0% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.2 and 3.2 (GOP margin +53.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.2, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 9.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.9. Supply constraint: 5.2. The numbers behind those: 8.3% poverty, 13.3% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Mountain sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Mountain, ND

Landlording in Mountain, North Dakota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Mountain is a city of 100 residents where 35.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 25.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $694/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Mountain eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Mountain closes 18 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Mountain's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Mountain runs $738 to $2,794 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 18 days of typical timeline and $694/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.6/10 in Mountain, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In North Dakota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Mountain: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match North Dakota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,794 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Mountain

Trap · 9.6/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Mountain's 3.8/10 is below the North Dakota state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 9.6/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue to avoid paying rent?

In North Dakota, a tenant generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues unless the landlord has failed to provide essential services after proper written notice and a reasonable time to repair. This is called "repair and deduct" or "constructive eviction." If they haven't followed this legal process, their claim likely won't prevent your eviction for non-payment. Document all maintenance requests and your responses thoroughly.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if a tenant stops paying?

Absolutely not. Self-help evictions, like changing locks, turning off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings, are illegal in North Dakota. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Attempting a self-help eviction can result in you facing legal action from the tenant, including significant financial penalties.

Q3

How long do I have to wait to re-rent after an eviction?

Once you legally regain possession of your property, typically after a sheriff lockout if the tenant doesn't leave voluntarily, you can immediately begin preparing the unit for a new tenant. There's no mandatory waiting period in North Dakota. Focus on quick turnover to minimize your vacancy losses.

Q4

Are there any local Mountain-specific tenant protections I need to know about?

Mountain, with its small population, is unlikely to have specific local ordinances that differ significantly from state law. North Dakota does not have statewide rent control or just-cause eviction requirements. However, it's always wise to do a quick check with the Pembina County clerk or local city office for any unique rules, though they are rare in such small communities. You can find more on statewide rules here: North Dakota tenant protections and North Dakota rent control rules.

Q5

What if the tenant abandons the property?

If you believe the tenant has abandoned the property (e.g., moved out all belongings, stopped paying rent, no communication), North Dakota law has specific procedures for determining abandonment and retaking possession. Generally, you need to provide notice of your intent to consider the property abandoned. Don't assume abandonment and change locks without following the legal steps, as this could be considered an illegal self-help eviction. Consult an attorney if you suspect abandonment.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Mountain in the 92nd percentile of North Dakota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.