Skip to content
Harvey, North Dakota eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,679 residents

Harvey, ND Eviction Risk: LOW

Wells County · Population 1,679

In 2026
Risk score
3.4
LOW

87th percentile, North Dakota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Harvey been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min1.5 Average2.9 Now3.4
4.5 1.5
Operator read

Of the 9 cities we track in the county, Harvey sits #1, among the friendlier places in the county to hold rental property. The 3.4/10 score has ranged only 1.5 to 4.5 across the 50-year reconstruction, so the environment is stable, not just currently favorable. The one number worth watching is tenant-organizing strength at 8.4/10, since that is the input with the most room to move.

What do renters in Harvey earn, and what are they paying?

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Harvey score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 1.5 Economic 5.0 Supply 5.1 Rent Control 4.8 Eviction 1.1 Tenant 8.4 Housing 5.5 3.4 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +62.9% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    North Dakota legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    12.9% poverty · 1.8% unemp.
    5.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $649 average · 38.2% renters
    5.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    29.0% of income on rent
    4.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    21 days filing → judgment
    1.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.2% renters
    8.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Harvey and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Harvey sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Wells County
Very High
#1 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 cities in Wells County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in North Dakota
High
#70 of 406 cities
Rank in state, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#70 of 406 cities in North Dakota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Harvey risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.4HarveyThis city3.3Countyavg in county3.4Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

North Dakota landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the North Dakota statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.4
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 21d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $649/mo. A contested eviction takes 21 days and costs $868–$2,463 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 38.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,679 residents, 38.2% rent. 29% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (GOP margin +62.9% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.1, housing court bias 5.5, rent-control risk 4.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.9 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5. Supply constraint: 5.1. The numbers behind those: 12.9% poverty, 1.8% unemployment, 29% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Harvey sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Harvey, ND

Landlording in Harvey, North Dakota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.4/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Harvey is a city of 1,679 residents where 38.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 29.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $649/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Harvey eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Harvey closes 21 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Harvey's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Harvey runs $868 to $2,463 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 21 days of typical timeline and $649/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.4/10 in Harvey, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In North Dakota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Harvey: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match North Dakota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,463 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Harvey

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
The 3.4/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Harvey's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.8/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Harvey?

The fastest way, outside of a court eviction, is often "cash for keys." Offer the tenant a lump sum of money (e.g., $500-$1,000) to voluntarily vacate the property within a few days, leaving it clean and returning the keys. This avoids court delays, legal fees, and potential property damage. If that fails, follow the 3-day pay-or-quit notice strictly, then file for eviction immediately.

Q2

Can I keep the security deposit if a tenant breaks the lease early?

Yes, potentially. If a tenant breaks the lease early, you can typically deduct for unpaid rent up to the point you re-rent the property, or until the lease term ends, whichever comes first. You can also deduct for damages beyond normal wear and tear. Remember the 30-day deadline to return the deposit or provide an itemized list of deductions. Consult North Dakota security deposit rules for specifics.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Harvey, ND?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in North Dakota. However, even with a low eviction-process-difficulty score, a lawyer can prevent costly mistakes, ensure proper notice serving, and represent you effectively in court. For an everyday landlord, especially if the tenant contests the eviction, an attorney is a wise investment to protect your interests.

Q4

What are the common landlord mistakes to avoid in Harvey?

Common mistakes include: not serving proper notice, accepting partial rent payments without a written agreement, attempting self-help eviction (changing locks, shutting off utilities), failing to return security deposits on time, and not having a solid, North Dakota-specific lease agreement. Always follow the letter of the law, especially N.D.C.C. § 47-16.

Q5

Does North Dakota have any tenant protections I should know about?

Yes, North Dakota has tenant protections, though not as extensive as some other states. Key protections include the right to a habitable living space, proper notice for entry, rules around security deposits, and the prohibition of self-help evictions. There are no statewide just-cause eviction requirements or source-of-income protections. For more details, see our North Dakota tenant protections guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.4/10 places Harvey in the 87th percentile of North Dakota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.