East Second Street Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dayton
Tract 39113001501 · Montgomery County, OH · pop 4,073 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 39113001501 covers part of the East Second Street Historic District area of Dayton, OH, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,073 residents. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Dayton and the region
Centroid at 39.7596, -84.1891 · click any tract to drill in
Why East Second Street Historic District scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow East Second Street Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 52%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 76%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 35%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,880Total filings over 17 yrs
- 7.44%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.7%Peak (2013)
- 108Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.9%Housing insecurity
- 9.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.5%Food insecurity
- 13.2%SNAP enrollment
- 9.1%Transit barriers
- 8.3%No health insurance
- 17.9%Frequent mental distress
- 27.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in East Second Street Historic District
72% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.7/10.
Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.4/10.
Against Montgomery County at 42.9%, 37% of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 1,880 evictions over 17 years of observation. Against the Montgomery County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 7.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 7.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 39113001501
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39113001501?
What is the average rent in tract 39113001501?
What is the poverty rate in tract 39113001501?
How socially vulnerable is tract 39113001501?
Is tract 39113001501 considered part of East Second Street Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39113001501?
What share of households in tract 39113001501 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 39113001501 compare to Dayton overall?
Was tract 39113001501 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Dayton
Top eight tracts in Dayton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.