Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Tenant beats landlord
9.9%
/ 100 outcomes
In court-decided eviction outcomes for Nash, OK, tenants prevail in roughly 9.9% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses, longer calendars, and more required documentation, and landlord-friendliness drops as this rises.
Timeline
26d
filing → judgment
From the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Nash, OK until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 26 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent and higher carry costs for landlords.
Cost range
$1.0–2.5k
legal + lost rent
A typical eviction in Nash, OK costs landlords $988 to $2,492 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent during the calendar between filing and possession.
Average rent
$807
30% stretched on rent
Average gross rent in Nash, OK is $807 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey (5-year 2023). 30% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent, the federal cost-burden threshold.
Renters
18.8%
of households
18.8% of occupied housing units in Nash, OK are renter-occupied (vs owner-occupied). A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings, more turnover, and a more active rental market.
Poverty
27.7%
20.4% unemp.
27.7% of Nash, OK residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 20.4%. Both feed into the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model because rent payment problems track poverty + joblessness more reliably than any other single signal.
Time machine
Scrub 50 years
197619861996200620162026
2026
● LIVE · today◀ REPLAY · historical
Nine-axis profile
9-axis profile · today
Shape of the risk surface
1 landlord · 10 tenant
Sub-scores · with sparkline
Where the score comes from
1 → 10 scale
Local political climate
GOP margin +76.6% (2024)
2.0
Regional political climate
County-weighted neighbor mix
2.0
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
27.7% poverty · 20.4% unemp.
9.3
Supply constraint
$807 average · 18.8% renters
3.6
Rent Control risk
30.1% of income on rent
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
26 days filing → judgment
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
18.8% renters
3.6
Housing court bias
County bench composition
1.1
Geographic context
Risk heat across Nash and the region
Click any city to see its score
How Nash compares
Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Alfalfa County
High
#4of 14 cities
#4 of 14 cities in Alfalfa County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oklahoma
Very High
#84of 840 cities
#84 of 840 cities in Oklahoma for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Score story
Six-stop tour of the risk profile
2.7
/ 10 · LOW
The verdict
A Low-tier market.
Composite 2.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.
50-yr trend-0.2 over 50 yr
197620012026
Steady ratchet · no large swings
26d
Typical timeline
The money
What renting (and evicting) looks like.
Rent published at $807/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $988–$2,492 per case.
50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
18.8%
Renters
The renters
Who you'll be renting to.
Out of 218 residents, 18.8% rent. 30% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 27.7% below the poverty line.
50-yr trendRenter share rising
197620012026
ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.
2
Local + regional
The politics
Light-statute interior market.
Local & regional political climate score 2 and 2 (GOP margin +76.6% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.
50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
197620012026
Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.
1.8
State politics
The process
Moderate calendar, moderate friction.
State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.2, housing court bias 1.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.
50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.8 since '00
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
9.3
Economic stress
The stress
Economic pressure is the real risk.
Economic stress: 9.3. Supply constraint: 3.6. The numbers behind those: 27.7% poverty, 20.4% unemployment, 30% of income on rent.
50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
197620012026
Mirrors BLS unemployment series.
US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost
Nash sits in the quick & cheap quadrant
Bubble size = population · color = risk score
Nash · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7National average: 58d · $4.6k all-inHover any bubble for stats · click to openColor: 0–4 4–7 7–10
Landlording in Nash, Oklahoma, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.
Nash is a city of 218 residents where 18.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $807/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.
01Process
How Nash eviction process actually works
Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Nash closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.
The slow part of Nash's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.
02Cost
What it costs (and how long it takes)
An all-in eviction in Nash runs $988 to $2,492 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.
For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $807/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.
03Operations
Security deposits, screening, and lease terms
Tenant organizing strength scores 3.6/10 in Nash, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:
Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oklahoma, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy
What an everyday landlord should actually do here
If you own one to four units in Nash: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.
The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oklahoma's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,492 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.
04bPractical traps
Local traps to avoid in Nash
Trap · 2.9/10
The 2.9/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Nash-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Q1
Can I just change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent in Nash?
Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings without a court order is illegal under Oklahoma law (41 O.S. § 123) and is considered a "self-help" eviction. You could face significant penalties, including fines and having to pay the tenant damages. Always follow the legal eviction process through the courts.
Q2
How long does it really take to evict someone in Nash, OK?
The typical timeline for an eviction in Nash, from serving the initial 5-day notice to regaining possession of the property, is around 26 days. This assumes a relatively straightforward case where the tenant doesn't heavily contest the eviction. If there are delays in service, court scheduling, or appeals, it could take longer.
Q3
Is there a cap on security deposits in Oklahoma?
No, Oklahoma state law does not impose a statutory cap on how much you can charge for a security deposit. However, it's common practice for landlords to charge one to two months' rent. You must return the deposit or provide an itemized list of deductions within 45 days after the tenant moves out and returns possession.
Q4
Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Nash?
While you are legally allowed to represent yourself in an Oklahoma eviction case, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney. They can ensure all notices are correctly served, court filings are accurate, and you navigate the legal process without costly errors. This can save you time and money in the long run, especially if the tenant contests the eviction.
Q5
What if my tenant abandons the property in Nash?
If a tenant abandons the property, you can take possession. However, there are specific rules about what constitutes abandonment and how to handle any personal property left behind (41 O.S. § 130). Generally, you'll need to provide notice to the tenant and store their property for a certain period before you can dispose of it. Consult an attorney or refer to state statutes to ensure you follow the correct procedure.
A 2.7/10 places Nash in the 95th percentile of Oklahoma cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.
Cities with similar eviction risk to Nash (2.7/10)
Same risk band nationally · click any city for its full breakdown.
