Skip to content
Bearden, Oklahoma eviction risk overview
City brief · 136 residents

Bearden, OK Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Okfuskee County · Population 136

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

52th percentile, Oklahoma.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.3 Now2.2
3.1 2.0 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 2.0 1989 · score 2.0 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.4 1994 · score 2.4 1995 · score 2.4 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.3 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.1 2009 · score 2.2 2010 · score 2.3 2011 · score 2.2 2012 · score 2.1 2013 · score 2.1 2014 · score 2.1 2015 · score 2.1 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.1 Regional 3.1 State 1.8 Economic 4.4 Supply 5.3 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.5 Tenant 5.3 Housing 1.5 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +55.8% (2024)
    3.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.1
  3. State political climate
    Oklahoma legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    2.8% poverty · 4.8% unemp.
    4.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $614 average · 12.2% renters
    5.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.6% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    23 days filing → judgment
    1.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.2% renters
    5.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bearden and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Bearden compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Okfuskee County
Moderate
#5 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 cities in Okfuskee County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oklahoma
Moderate
#408 of 840 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#408 of 840 cities in Oklahoma for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Bearden risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Bearden: 2.22.2BeardenThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 23d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $614/mo. A contested eviction takes 23 days and costs $889–$2,756 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 136 residents, 12.2% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 2.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.1 and 3.1 (GOP margin +55.8% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.5, housing court bias 1.5, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 5.3. The numbers behind those: 2.8% poverty, 4.8% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Bearden sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Oklahoma City, OK · 26d · ~$1.9k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.2 Oklahoma City Tulsa, OK · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Tulsa Norman, OK · 24d · ~$1.6k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Norman Broken Arrow, OK · 23d · ~$1.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 1.9 Broken Arrow Edmond, OK · 24d · ~$1.5k all-in ($64/day) · score 1.9 Edmond Lawton, OK · 22d · ~$1.9k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.4 Lawton Moore, OK · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 2 Moore Midwest City, OK · 26d · ~$1.6k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.2 Midwest City Enid, OK · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.2 Enid Fayetteville, AR · 29d · ~$1.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.3 Fayetteville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Bearden
Bearden · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Bearden, OK

Landlording in Bearden, Oklahoma, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Bearden is a city of 136 residents where 12.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $614/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Bearden eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Bearden closes 23 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Bearden's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Bearden runs $889 to $2,756 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 23 days of typical timeline and $614/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.3/10 in Bearden, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oklahoma, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Bearden: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oklahoma's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,756 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Bearden

Trap · 41 OS
Compare Bearden to nearby cities in Okfuskee County via the related-cities grid below. Each municipality scores separately on the same nine sub-factors. State context: 41 OS.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Bearden for minor lease violations?

Yes, generally. Oklahoma law allows for eviction based on material non-compliance with the lease agreement. However, for minor or curable violations, you often need to provide a notice giving the tenant a chance to fix the issue before you can file for eviction. Always refer to your lease and Oklahoma's Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (41 O.S. § 101 et seq.) for specific notice requirements.

Q2

Do I need a lawyer to evict a tenant in Bearden?

While you are not legally required to have an attorney for a forcible entry and detainer action in Oklahoma, it is highly recommended. Eviction procedures have strict rules, and a single mistake can cause significant delays or even dismissal of your case. An attorney ensures proper notice, filing, and representation in court, often saving you money and time in the long run. See our Oklahoma eviction risk overview for more on this.

Q3

How long does it take to get a tenant out after a court order in Bearden?

After a judge rules in your favor, the tenant typically has a short period (often a few days) to vacate voluntarily. If they don't, you can request a "Writ of Assistance" or "Writ of Execution" from the court. This writ authorizes the sheriff to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. The sheriff will schedule a lockout, usually within a few days to a week after receiving the writ. The total typical timeline from notice to lockout is around 23 days.

Q4

Can I change the locks if the tenant hasn't paid rent in Bearden?

Absolutely not. This is considered an illegal "self-help" eviction and can expose you to significant legal liability, including fines and damages. In Oklahoma, you must go through the proper legal eviction process via the courts to regain possession of your property. Even if a tenant is clearly in violation, you cannot cut off utilities or change locks. Review Oklahoma tenant protections to avoid common pitfalls.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Bearden in the 52nd percentile of Oklahoma cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.