Skip to content
Osage, Oklahoma eviction risk overview
City brief · 103 residents

Osage, OK Eviction Risk: LOW

Pawnee County · Population 103

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

99th percentile, Oklahoma.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average2.6 Now2.8
3.5 2.2 1976 · score 2.9 1977 · score 2.9 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.9 1981 · score 2.8 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.9 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.2 1990 · score 2.2 1991 · score 2.3 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.6 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.7 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.6 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.4 2006 · score 2.3 2007 · score 2.3 2008 · score 2.3 2009 · score 2.5 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.2 2021 · score 3.5 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.9 2025 · score 2.9 2026 · score 2.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.9 Regional 2.9 State 1.8 Economic 8.8 Supply 2.6 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 2.6 Housing 1.8 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +58.9% (2024)
    2.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.9
  3. State political climate
    Oklahoma legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    22.6% poverty · 12.2% unemp.
    8.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $752 average · 7.8% renters
    2.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.2% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    27 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    7.8% renters
    2.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Osage and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Osage compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pawnee County
Very High
#1 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 13 cities in Pawnee County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oklahoma
Very High
#34 of 840 cities
Rank in state, 96th percentileLowHigh
#34 of 840 cities in Oklahoma for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Osage risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Osage: 2.82.8OsageThis cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 27d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $752/mo. A contested eviction takes 27 days and costs $919–$2,601 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 7.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 103 residents, 7.8% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 22.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.9 and 2.9 (GOP margin +58.9% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 1.8, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.8. Supply constraint: 2.6. The numbers behind those: 22.6% poverty, 12.2% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Osage sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Tulsa, OK · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Tulsa Broken Arrow, OK · 23d · ~$1.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 1.9 Broken Arrow Oklahoma City, OK · 26d · ~$1.9k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.2 Oklahoma City Norman, OK · 24d · ~$1.6k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Norman Edmond, OK · 24d · ~$1.5k all-in ($64/day) · score 1.9 Edmond Lawton, OK · 22d · ~$1.9k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.4 Lawton Moore, OK · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 2 Moore Midwest City, OK · 26d · ~$1.6k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.2 Midwest City Enid, OK · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.2 Enid Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Osage
Osage · 27d · ~$1.8k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Osage, OK

Landlording in Osage, Oklahoma, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Osage is a city of 103 residents where 7.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.2% of income on rent. At an average rent of $752/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Osage eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Osage closes 27 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Osage's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Osage runs $919 to $2,601 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 27 days of typical timeline and $752/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.6/10 in Osage, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oklahoma, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Osage: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oklahoma's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,601 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Osage

Trap · 57.5 POINTS
Pawnee County voted Republican by 57.5 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral statutory bias under 41 OS.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant abandons the property?

If a tenant abandons the property in Osage, meaning they've moved out and stopped paying rent without formally terminating the lease, Oklahoma law (41 O.S. § 130) allows you to take possession. Look for clear indicators like utilities being disconnected, personal belongings removed, and no response to your attempts to contact them. It's best practice to send a notice of abandonment to their last known address and wait a reasonable period (e.g., 7-10 days) before re-entering and securing the property. Document everything with photos.
Q2

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. In Oklahoma, it is illegal for a landlord to intentionally interrupt essential services like water, electricity, or gas to force a tenant out, even if they're behind on rent. Doing so can lead to significant penalties, including the tenant suing you for damages. You must follow the proper eviction process.
Q3

How much can I charge for late fees in Osage?

Oklahoma law allows landlords to charge reasonable late fees. While there's no specific statutory cap, courts generally consider fees between $25 and $50, or a percentage of the monthly rent (typically 5-10%), to be reasonable. Make sure your late fee policy is clearly stated in your lease agreement.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction in Oklahoma?

While you are legally allowed to represent yourself in an eviction case in Oklahoma, especially in district court for a straightforward non-payment, it's often advisable to hire an attorney. They can ensure all notices are correct, filings are timely, and you navigate court procedures efficiently, saving you time and potential costly mistakes. Given the low eviction process difficulty score here, you might feel comfortable handling a very simple case yourself, but for anything complex, get legal help.
Q5

Are there any tenant protections I should be aware of in Osage?

While Oklahoma generally has landlord-friendly laws, you still need to adhere to the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. This includes providing habitable living conditions, respecting tenant privacy (e.g., giving proper notice before entry), and following specific procedures for security deposits and evictions. There are no statewide "just cause" eviction requirements or rent control in Oklahoma. For a full overview, check out Oklahoma tenant protections.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Osage in the 99th percentile of Oklahoma cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.