Skip to content
Gans, Oklahoma eviction risk overview
City brief · 304 residents

Gans, OK Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Sequoyah County · Population 304

In 2026
Risk score
4
MODERATE

95th percentile, Oklahoma.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average3.8 Now4
5.1 2.5 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 3.1 1979 · score 3.1 1980 · score 3.1 1981 · score 3.2 1982 · score 3.3 1983 · score 3.5 1984 · score 3.4 1985 · score 3.7 1986 · score 3.8 1987 · score 3.7 1988 · score 4.0 1989 · score 3.9 1990 · score 3.9 1991 · score 3.9 1992 · score 3.9 1993 · score 3.9 1994 · score 3.8 1995 · score 3.8 1996 · score 4.0 1997 · score 4.0 1998 · score 4.0 1999 · score 4.0 2000 · score 4.0 2001 · score 3.9 2002 · score 4.0 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 3.9 2006 · score 3.9 2007 · score 3.9 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.0 2010 · score 4.0 2011 · score 3.9 2012 · score 3.9 2013 · score 3.9 2014 · score 3.9 2015 · score 3.9 2016 · score 4.0 2017 · score 3.9 2018 · score 3.9 2019 · score 4.0 2020 · score 4.7 2021 · score 5.1 2022 · score 4.2 2023 · score 4.0 2024 · score 4.2 2025 · score 4.2 2026 · score 4.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.8 Regional 2.8 State 1.8 Economic 8.2 Supply 5.4 Rent Control 6.4 Eviction 1.7 Tenant 7.1 Housing 7.7 4 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +61.5% (2024)
    2.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.8
  3. State political climate
    Oklahoma legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    28.1% poverty · 6.3% unemp.
    8.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $775 average · 38.5% renters
    5.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    24.5% of income on rent
    6.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    25 days filing → judgment
    1.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.5% renters
    7.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gans and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Gans compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Sequoyah County
High
#4 of 30 cities
Rank in county, 90th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 30 cities in Sequoyah County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oklahoma
High
#86 of 840 cities
Rank in state, 90th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 840 cities in Oklahoma for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Gans risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Gans: 4.04.0GansThis cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avg

Oklahoma landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Oklahoma statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 25d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $775/mo. A contested eviction takes 25 days and costs $938–$2,324 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 38.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 304 residents, 38.5% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 28.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 2.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.8 and 2.8 (GOP margin +61.5% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.7, housing court bias 7.7, rent-control risk 6.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.3 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 8.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.2. Supply constraint: 5.4. The numbers behind those: 28.1% poverty, 6.3% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Gans sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Oklahoma City, OK · 26d · ~$1.9k all-in ($71/day) · score 3.4 Oklahoma City Tulsa, OK · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.4 Tulsa Norman, OK · 24d · ~$1.6k all-in ($65/day) · score 3.4 Norman Broken Arrow, OK · 23d · ~$1.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.2 Broken Arrow Edmond, OK · 24d · ~$1.5k all-in ($64/day) · score 3.2 Edmond Lawton, OK · 22d · ~$1.9k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.4 Lawton Moore, OK · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.2 Moore Midwest City, OK · 26d · ~$1.6k all-in ($60/day) · score 3.2 Midwest City Enid, OK · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.2 Enid Little Rock, AR · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.3 Little Rock Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Gans
Gans · 25d · ~$1.6k all-in ($65/day) · score 4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Gans, OK

Landlording in Gans, Oklahoma, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Gans is a city of 304 residents where 38.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 24.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $775/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Gans eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Gans closes 25 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Gans's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Gans runs $938 to $2,324 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 25 days of typical timeline and $775/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.1/10 in Gans, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oklahoma, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Gans: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oklahoma's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,324 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Gans

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Gans to neighboring cities in Sequoyah County via the grid below. The 4/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under 41 OS. Sequoyah County 2020 presidential margin: R+59.0. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Oklahoma statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I change the locks if my Gans tenant doesn't pay rent after the 5-day notice?

Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings yourself is considered an illegal "self-help" eviction in Oklahoma. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. If you illegally evict a tenant, they can sue you for damages, which will cost you far more than a proper eviction.

Q2

Is there rent control in Gans, OK?

No, there is no rent control in Gans or anywhere in Oklahoma. Oklahoma has a statewide preemption against rent control, meaning local governments cannot enact their own rent control ordinances. This gives landlords flexibility in setting and adjusting rent, though our rent-control-risk sub-score for Oklahoma is 6.4/10, indicating some legislative pressure over time. For more on this, see our Oklahoma rent control rules.

Q3

How much can I charge for late fees in Gans?

Oklahoma law allows for reasonable late fees, but they must be clearly stated in your lease agreement. While there isn't a specific cap, excessive late fees could be challenged in court as punitive. A common practice is to charge a flat fee or a percentage of the monthly rent, typically 5-10%, after a grace period (e.g., 3-5 days).

Q4

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue to avoid paying rent?

Tenants in Oklahoma generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues unless they have followed a very specific legal procedure outlined in 41 O.S. § 121, which includes giving you written notice and a reasonable time to make repairs. If they haven't followed this, their claim won't excuse non-payment. Address legitimate maintenance issues promptly, but don't let it distract from a non-payment eviction.

Q5

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Gans?

You are not legally required to have an attorney for an eviction in Oklahoma. However, it's highly recommended, especially if it's your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting the eviction. An attorney ensures all legal procedures are followed, saving you time and preventing costly mistakes. The housing-court-bias sub-score for Oklahoma is 7.7/10, suggesting the courts can lean tenant-favorable, making legal representation even more valuable.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4/10 places Gans in the 95th percentile of Oklahoma cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.