Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Pleasant Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , North Charleston

Tract 45019003115 · Charleston County, SC · pop 8,255 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 45019003115 covers the Pleasant Hills neighborhood of North Charleston, home to 8,255 residents. For landlords it grades 5.8/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 57% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,253 monthly, set against $51,188 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 40% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 17% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,777
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate32.1%
Median income$51,188

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Pleasant Hills
Very High
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 31 tracts In North Charleston
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#157 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Charleston and the region

Centroid at 32.9799, -80.0613 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pleasant Hills scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Charleston
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
32.1% poverty · this tract
8.0
Supply constraint
$1,253 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0

How Pleasant Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pleasant Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 003115North Charleston: 2.62.6North Charlestonparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,692Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 26.55%Avg annual filing rate
  • 34.3%Peak (2014)
  • 441Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190031152012: 322 filings (20.21/100 renter HHs)2013: 383 filings (24.04/100 renter HHs)2014: 546 filings (34.27/100 renter HHs)2015: 441 filings (27.68/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 37% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,900Total filings 2020-21
  • 24.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 35.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.70×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 59 filings (1.48× baseline)2020-02-01: 40 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-03-01: 24 filings (1.01× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 9 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-06-01: 32 filings (0.97× baseline)2020-07-01: 13 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-08-01: 19 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-09-01: 18 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-11-01: 25 filings (0.66× baseline)2020-12-01: 17 filings (0.39× baseline)2021-01-01: 8 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-02-01: 12 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-03-01: 21 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-04-01: 8 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 7 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-08-01: 25 filings (0.51× baseline)2021-09-01: 23 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-10-01: 42 filings (0.85× baseline)2021-11-01: 22 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-12-01: 19 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-01-01: 29 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-02-01: 15 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-03-01: 15 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-04-01: 16 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 27 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 16 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-07-01: 31 filings (0.85× baseline)2022-08-01: 32 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-09-01: 41 filings (0.96× baseline)2022-10-01: 44 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-11-01: 28 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-12-01: 27 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-01-01: 35 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-02-01: 26 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-03-01: 28 filings (1.18× baseline)2023-04-01: 18 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-05-01: 36 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-06-01: 16 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-07-01: 33 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-08-01: 47 filings (0.96× baseline)2023-09-01: 20 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 41 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-11-01: 22 filings (0.58× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-01-01: 52 filings (1.31× baseline)2024-02-01: 25 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-03-01: 26 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-04-01: 22 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-05-01: 36 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-06-01: 48 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-07-01: 29 filings (0.79× baseline)2024-08-01: 21 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-09-01: 21 filings (0.49× baseline)2024-10-01: 48 filings (0.97× baseline)2024-11-01: 39 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-12-01: 25 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-01-01: 27 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-02-01: 33 filings (0.99× baseline)2025-03-01: 41 filings (1.73× baseline)2025-04-01: 33 filings (1.02× baseline)2025-05-01: 29 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-06-01: 32 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-07-01: 39 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-08-01: 35 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-09-01: 34 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 44 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-11-01: 27 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (0.16× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pleasant Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pleasant Hills

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Charleston County average of 5.2 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.70x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019003115

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019003115?

Census tract 45019003115 in the Pleasant Hills neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019003115?

Median gross rent is $1,253/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019003115?

32.1% of residents in tract 45019003115 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,255.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019003115?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 93th, minority 67th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 45019003115 considered part of Pleasant Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45019003115 fall within Pleasant Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019003115?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,692 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019003115 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.55% of renter households, peaking at 34.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 45019003115 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.70× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 45019003115 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 45019003115 compare to North Charleston overall?

Tract 45019003115 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of North Charleston at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Charleston

Top eight tracts in North Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related