Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Foxwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Red Bank
Tract 45063021044 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,398 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Here is how census tract 45063021044, in the Foxwood Hills area of Red Bank eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 4.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 2,398. It lands near the 25th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 6% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,308 monthly, set against $75,250 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,093
Renter share24.6%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$75,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
18
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 33.9459, -81.1862 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foxwood Hills scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,308 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
How Foxwood Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 27%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.0%Housing insecurity
- 8.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.3%Food insecurity
- 10.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.4%Transit barriers
- 12.8%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 32.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foxwood Hills
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lexington County average of 5.3 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45063021044
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021044?
Census tract 45063021044 in the Foxwood Hills neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45063021044?
Median gross rent is $1,308/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 6% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021044?
5.4% of residents in tract 45063021044 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,398.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021044?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 49th, minority 34th, housing 27th.
Q5
Is tract 45063021044 considered part of Foxwood Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021044 fall within Foxwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 45063021044 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45063021044 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 45063021044 scores 2.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Red Bank at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related