Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Foxwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Red Bank

Tract 45063021044 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,398 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

With a score of 3.2/10, tract 45063021044 in the Foxwood Hills area of Red Bank, SC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,398 residents. Cost burden runs 6% here against 37.2% across Lexington County.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 23% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,093
Renter share24.6%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$75,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Foxwood Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Red Bank
Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#860 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Red Bank and the region

Centroid at 33.9459, -81.1862 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foxwood Hills scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,308 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6

How Foxwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foxwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 0210443.7Red Bankparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foxwood Hills

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.6/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.1/10. At $1,308 a month, rents run 13% over what the rest of Red Bank commands.

Against the Lexington County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 25% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $75,250.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021044

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021044?

Census tract 45063021044 in the Foxwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021044?

Median gross rent is $1,308/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 6% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021044?

5.4% of residents in tract 45063021044 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,398.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021044?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 49th, minority 34th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021044 considered part of Foxwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021044 fall within Foxwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 45063021044 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45063021044 compare to Red Bank overall?

Tract 45063021044 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Red Bank at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank

Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related