Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally
Woodland Pond Eviction Risk: Lower , Red Bank
Tract 45063021035 · Lexington County, SC · pop 3,055 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Census tract 45063021035 covers part of the Woodland Pond area of Red Bank, SC, and scores 3.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,055. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.6/10.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,193
Renter share11.8%
SVI overall0.30
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$72,539
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
31
th percentile
Low
Within state
32
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 33.9244, -81.2511 · click any tract to drill in
Why Woodland Pond scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,024 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
How Woodland Pond compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 30
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Woodland Pond. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.0%Housing insecurity
- 9.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.6%Food insecurity
- 9.9%SNAP enrollment
- 8.5%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 17.9%Frequent mental distress
- 30.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Woodland Pond
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Against Lexington County at 37.2%, 28% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.1/10.
The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against the Lexington County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.
At $1,024 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Red Bank commands. On the national scale it lands near the 22nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $72,539, annual rent is just 17%. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 45063021035
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021035?
Census tract 45063021035 in the Woodland Pond neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45063021035?
Median gross rent is $1,024/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021035?
4.0% of residents in tract 45063021035 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,055.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021035?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 30th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 17th, minority 24th, housing 42th.
Q5
Is tract 45063021035 considered part of Woodland Pond?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021035 fall within Woodland Pond (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 45063021035 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45063021035 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 45063021035 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Red Bank at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related