Woodland Pond Eviction Risk: Lower , Red Bank
Tract 45063021035 · Lexington County, SC · pop 3,055 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
In Woodland Pond in Red Bank, census tract 45063021035 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,024 a month against an average household income of $72,539 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 33.9244, -81.2511 · click any tract to drill in
Why Woodland Pond scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Woodland Pond compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 30
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Woodland Pond. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.0%Housing insecurity
- 9.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.6%Food insecurity
- 9.9%SNAP enrollment
- 8.5%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 17.9%Frequent mental distress
- 30.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Woodland Pond
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lexington County average of 5.3 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 30th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 45063021035
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021035?
What is the average rent in tract 45063021035?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021035?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021035?
Is tract 45063021035 considered part of Woodland Pond?
What share of households in tract 45063021035 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45063021035 compare to Red Bank overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.