Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Manchester Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Red Bank
Tract 45063021052 · Lexington County, SC · pop 3,107 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 45063021052 sits in the Manchester Park area of Red Bank eviction risk, South Carolina eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #37,255 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
36% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $999 a month while the average household earns $58,555 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 37% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,301
Renter share37.0%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$58,555
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
36
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 33.9187, -81.1956 · click any tract to drill in
Why Manchester Park scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$999 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
How Manchester Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 90%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.6%Housing insecurity
- 10.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.9%Food insecurity
- 14.4%SNAP enrollment
- 11.0%Transit barriers
- 16.0%No health insurance
- 20.1%Frequent mental distress
- 35.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Manchester Park
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lexington County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 16.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45063021052
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021052?
Census tract 45063021052 in the Manchester Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45063021052?
Median gross rent is $999/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021052?
11.7% of residents in tract 45063021052 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,107.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021052?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 45th, minority 30th, housing 75th.
Q5
Is tract 45063021052 considered part of Manchester Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021052 fall within Manchester Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 45063021052 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45063021052 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 45063021052 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related