Skip to content
Centerville, South Dakota eviction risk overview
City brief · 903 residents

Centerville, SD Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Turner County · Population 903

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

75th percentile, South Dakota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.4 Now2
3.1 1.9 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.7 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.5 2010 · score 2.6 2011 · score 2.6 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.2 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.3 2023 · score 1.9 2024 · score 1.9 2025 · score 2.0 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 1.5 Economic 4.8 Supply 4.1 Rent Control 2.6 Eviction 1.1 Tenant 5.5 Housing 3.7 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +51.3% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    South Dakota legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    8.6% poverty · 3.0% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $485 average · 21.7% renters
    4.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.8% of income on rent
    2.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    18 days filing → judgment
    1.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    21.7% renters
    5.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Centerville and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Centerville compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Turner County
High
#2 of 10 cities
Rank in county, 89th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 10 cities in Turner County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in South Dakota
Elevated
#132 of 484 cities
Rank in state, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#132 of 484 cities in South Dakota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Centerville risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Centerville: 2.02.0CentervilleThis cityCounty: 1.81.8Countyavg in countyState: 1.91.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 18d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $485/mo. A contested eviction takes 18 days and costs $734–$2,576 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 21.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 903 residents, 21.7% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (GOP margin +51.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.1, housing court bias 3.7, rent-control risk 2.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 4.1. The numbers behind those: 8.6% poverty, 3.0% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Centerville sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Centerville, SD

Landlording in Centerville, South Dakota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Centerville is a city of 903 residents where 21.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $485/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Centerville eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Centerville closes 18 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Centerville's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Centerville runs $734 to $2,576 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 18 days of typical timeline and $485/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.5/10 in Centerville, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In South Dakota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Centerville: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match South Dakota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,576 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Centerville

Trap · 8.6%
Local poverty rate is 8.6%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward moderate volume in Clay County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 2.6/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Centerville without a reason?

No, you cannot evict a tenant without a valid reason in Centerville or anywhere in South Dakota. You need a "cause," such as non-payment of rent, a lease violation, or the expiration of a fixed-term lease. For month-to-month tenancies, you can issue a 30-day notice to terminate without specific cause, but it's not an "eviction" in the traditional sense.
Q2

How long does an eviction take in Centerville?

A typical eviction in Centerville takes around 18 days from the initial notice to getting possession back. This is an average for uncontested cases. If a tenant fights the eviction, or if there are procedural delays, it can take longer.
Q3

What are the common mistakes landlords make during eviction?

Common mistakes include improper notice (wrong dates, incorrect service), self-help evictions (changing locks, shutting off utilities, highly illegal), failing to document interactions, and not understanding the court process. Always follow the legal steps precisely.
Q4

Is there rent control in Centerville, SD?

No, there is no rent control in Centerville or anywhere in South Dakota. Landlords are generally free to set rent prices and increase them as market conditions dictate, provided proper notice is given for increases in periodic tenancies. For more, see our South Dakota rent control rules.
Q5

What should I do if my tenant damages the property beyond normal wear and tear?

Document the damage with photos and itemized repair costs. You can deduct these costs from the security deposit. If the damages exceed the deposit amount, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the difference. Make sure to return any remaining deposit balance within 14 days with an itemized statement.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Centerville in the 75th percentile of South Dakota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.