Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Gulf Dale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Mobile

Tract 01097001902 · Mobile County, AL · pop 3,859 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

01097001902 is a census tract in the Gulf Dale area of Mobile, AL. It scores 4.7/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,859 residents. At $652 a month, rents run 39% under what the rest of Mobile commands.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 20% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,348
Renter share31.4%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate26.2%
Median income$63,611

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Gulf Dale
Moderate
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 78 tracts In Mobile
Elevated
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#43 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#390 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mobile and the region

Centroid at 30.6021, -88.0988 · click any tract to drill in

Why Gulf Dale scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mobile
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
26.2% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$652 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mobile
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mobile
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mobile
3.0

How Gulf Dale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Gulf Dale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 001902Mobile: 3.63.6Mobileparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 183Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 4.32%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.7%Peak (2006)
  • 14Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010970019022001: 19 filings (5.18/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2006: 25 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)2007: 25 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)2008: 18 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2009: 20 filings (4.59/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)2014: 18 filings (4.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 8 filings (1.91/100 renter HHs)2016: 14 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 26% over the past 10 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Gulf Dale

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.6% across Mobile County.

The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. 13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 28.1% against 17.8% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 183 evictions over 10 years of observation. It sits 0.7 points above the Mobile County average of 4.0.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2006 at 5.7% of renter households.

In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097001902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097001902?

Census tract 01097001902 in the Gulf Dale neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097001902?

Median gross rent is $652/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097001902?

26.2% of residents in tract 01097001902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,859.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097001902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 95th, minority 74th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 01097001902 considered part of Gulf Dale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097001902 fall within Gulf Dale (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097001902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 183 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097001902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.32% of renter households, peaking at 5.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097001902 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097001902 compare to Mobile overall?

Tract 01097001902 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Mobile at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mobile eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mobile

Top eight tracts in Mobile ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related