Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Badger Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 02090001501 · Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK · pop 4,299 · 62% of tract blocks fall in Badger
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 02090001501 (Badger, Alaska) comes in at 3.8/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 9% of US census tracts.
49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,568 a month while the average household earns $114,839 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,501
Renter share16.7%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$114,839
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
9
th percentile
Very Low
National
6
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Badger and the region
Centroid at 64.7785, -147.2313 · click any tract to drill in
Why Badger scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Badger
1.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Alaska legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,568 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Badger
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Badger
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Badger
3.3
How Badger compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 65%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.8%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 6.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.0%Transit barriers
- 8.6%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 26.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Badger
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Badger eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Fairbanks North Star County average of 3.5 and in line with the Alaska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 40th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 02090001501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 02090001501?
Census tract 02090001501 in Badger scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 02090001501?
Median gross rent is $1,568/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 02090001501?
3.9% of residents in tract 02090001501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,299.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 02090001501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 19th, minority 46th, housing 65th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 02090001501 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 02090001501 compare to Badger overall?
Tract 02090001501 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Badger at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Badger eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Badger
Top eight tracts in Badger ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related