Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Chickasaw Place Eviction Risk: Elevated , Little Rock

Tract 05119001300 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 2,317 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 05119001300 belongs to Chickasaw Place in Little Rock, Arkansas. It is home to 2,317 residents and scores 5.2/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 47th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $973 a month against an average household income of $38,750 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 49% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 26% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units736
Renter share48.9%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate38.0%
Median income$38,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Chickasaw Place
Moderate
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#6 of 58 tracts In Little Rock
Very High
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#88 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Rock and the region

Centroid at 34.7384, -92.3113 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chickasaw Place scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little Rock
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
38.0% poverty · this tract
9.5
Supply constraint
$973 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Rock
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Rock
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Rock
2.0

How Chickasaw Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chickasaw Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.36.3This tracttract 001300Little Rock: 2.22.2Little Rockparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chickasaw Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chickasaw Place

What moves this score most is economic stress at 9.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119001300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119001300?

Census tract 05119001300 in the Chickasaw Place neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119001300?

Median gross rent is $973/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119001300?

38.0% of residents in tract 05119001300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,317.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119001300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 45th, minority 89th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 05119001300 considered part of Chickasaw Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05119001300 fall within Chickasaw Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05119001300 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 26.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05119001300 compare to Little Rock overall?

Tract 05119001300 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of Little Rock at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 05119001300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock

Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related