Chickasaw Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Little Rock
Tract 05119004500 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 2,130 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 05119004500 sits in the Chickasaw Place area of Little Rock eviction risk, AR, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.5/10. Population here is 2,130. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Little Rock and the region
Centroid at 34.7394, -92.2926 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chickasaw Place scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Chickasaw Place compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 82
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 76%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 5%Grade A
- 23%Grade B
- 21%Grade C
- 49%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chickasaw Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.7%Housing insecurity
- 17.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 28.3%Food insecurity
- 18.4%SNAP enrollment
- 16.7%Transit barriers
- 11.2%No health insurance
- 21.5%Frequent mental distress
- 38.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Chickasaw Place
Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $36,154, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.
68% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. Food insecurity runs 28.3% against 17.8% nationally.
The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Housing insecurity runs 22.7% against 14.2% nationally.
Against the Pulaski County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.6 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 05119004500
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119004500?
What is the average rent in tract 05119004500?
What is the poverty rate in tract 05119004500?
How socially vulnerable is tract 05119004500?
Is tract 05119004500 considered part of Chickasaw Place?
What share of households in tract 05119004500 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 05119004500 compare to Little Rock overall?
Was tract 05119004500 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock
Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.