Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Chickasaw Place Eviction Risk: Elevated , Little Rock

Tract 05119001100 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 2,025 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

For landlords sizing up Chickasaw Place in Little Rock, census tract 05119001100 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. On the national scale it ranks #47,426 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,107 monthly, set against $38,333 in average yearly household income, roughly 35% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 23% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units704
Renter share44.7%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate32.0%
Median income$38,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Chickasaw Place
Very High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 58 tracts In Little Rock
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#11 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
Very High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#88 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Rock and the region

Centroid at 34.7217, -92.2955 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chickasaw Place scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little Rock
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
32.0% poverty · this tract
8.0
Supply constraint
$1,107 rent vs county FMR
5.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Rock
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Rock
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Rock
2.0

How Chickasaw Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chickasaw Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.36.3This tracttract 001100Little Rock: 2.22.2Little Rockparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chickasaw Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chickasaw Place

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 65% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

In CDC survey modeling, about 32.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 28.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119001100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119001100?

Census tract 05119001100 in the Chickasaw Place neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119001100?

Median gross rent is $1,107/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119001100?

32.0% of residents in tract 05119001100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,025.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119001100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 68th, minority 98th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 05119001100 considered part of Chickasaw Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05119001100 fall within Chickasaw Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05119001100 struggle to pay rent?

About 32.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 28.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05119001100 compare to Little Rock overall?

Tract 05119001100 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of Little Rock at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 05119001100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 65% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock

Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related