Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Hicks Interuban Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Little Rock

Tract 05119002407 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 1,982 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 05119002407 (the Hicks Interuban Addition neighborhood of Little Rock, Arkansas) comes in at 3.7/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 8% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 21% of renter households, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,307 a month against an average household income of $76,383 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 32% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,078
Renter share41.3%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$76,383

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Hicks Interuban Addition
Very Low
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 58 tracts In Little Rock
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#533 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Rock and the region

Centroid at 34.7406, -92.4038 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hicks Interuban Addition scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little Rock
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,307 rent vs county FMR
7.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Rock
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Rock
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Rock
2.0

How Hicks Interuban Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hicks Interuban Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 002407Little Rock: 2.22.2Little Rockparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hicks Interuban Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hicks Interuban Addition

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 7.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and below the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119002407

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119002407?

Census tract 05119002407 in the Hicks Interuban Addition neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119002407?

Median gross rent is $1,307/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119002407?

9.7% of residents in tract 05119002407 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,982.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119002407?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 17th, minority 55th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 05119002407 considered part of Hicks Interuban Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05119002407 fall within Hicks Interuban Addition (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05119002407 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05119002407 compare to Little Rock overall?

Tract 05119002407 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Little Rock at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock

Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related