Turtle Creek Eviction Risk: Elevated , Concord

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10. Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally.

On the national scale it lands near the 83rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Contra Costa County average of 6.8 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.