Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037143901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,222 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 06037143901 sits in the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.4/10. The severe-burden share is 44%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1321, -118.4001 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 52%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 16%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 15%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.4%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.4%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 3.1%No health insurance
- 13.2%Frequent mental distress
- 22.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 81% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037143901
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143901?
What is the average rent in tract 06037143901?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143901?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143901?
Is tract 06037143901 considered part of Silver Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037143901 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037143901 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037143901 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.