Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High
8 census tracts · pop 31,328 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 8.6/10 · range 8.4–9.3
Silver Triangle spans 8 census tracts of Los Angeles, CA and houses 31,328 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 8.6/10, placing it in the High tier. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
roughly one in two of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, markedly above the Los Angeles rate of 35.0%. Sitting well above the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty at 9.5/10.
Running hot is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. At $2,558 a month, rents sit 32% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
The severe-burden share is 23%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. Food insecurity affects 7.7% of adults, 10.1 points below the national rate. SNAP participation is 7.0% of households versus 15.2% nationally.
Among the 161 mapped neighborhoods of Los Angeles, it ranks #130 by risk, the lower third. The closest comparables inside the same city are Remington Place and Chatsworth. Poverty sits at 7%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
The 8 tracts here are tightly clustered, 0.9 points apart at the extremes.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Silver Triangle and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 8 tracts span score 8.4–9.3
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.6
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlySilver Triangle vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Silver Triangle?
Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.
8 tracts in Silver Triangle
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06037143602 | 9.3 | 4,734 | 55% | $1,862 |
| 06037143401 | 8.5 | 5,478 | 53% | $2,450 |
| 06037143500 | 8.4 | 5,328 | 46% | $2,732 |
| 06037143901 | 8.4 | 4,222 | 54% | $3,501 |
| 06037143801 | 8.4 | 3,411 | 30% | $2,837 |
| 06037143302 | 8.4 | 3,258 | 52% | $2,153 |
| 06037143902 | 8.4 | 3,053 | 39% | $2,514 |
| 06037143402 | 8.4 | 1,844 | 41% | $2,282 |
CDC SVI percentile: 33
Pop-weighted across 8 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Silver Triangle
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 8.0%Housing insecurity
- 3.9%Utility shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 22.8%Any disability
About Silver Triangle
How does Silver Triangle compare to Los Angeles overall?
What is the average rent in Silver Triangle?
What percentage of Silver Triangle residents are renters?
Is Silver Triangle a high social-vulnerability area?
Which tracts in Silver Triangle have the highest eviction risk?
How safe is Silver Triangle for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Silver Triangle?
Other neighborhoods near Silver Triangle
Other neighborhoods inside Los Angeles
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Silver Triangle.