Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037143402 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,844 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 06037143402 covers part of the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,844. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 33% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units791
Renter share55.9%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$127,083

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 8 tracts In Silver Triangle
Elevated
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#956 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,427 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1547, -118.4022 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,282 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Silver Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 143402Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 7.3% against 17.8% nationally. At $2,282 a month, rents run 18% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 2.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037143402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143402?

Census tract 06037143402 in the Silver Triangle neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037143402?

Median gross rent is $2,282/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143402?

1.7% of residents in tract 06037143402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,844.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 10th, minority 17th, housing 14th.
Q5

Is tract 06037143402 considered part of Silver Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037143402 fall within Silver Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037143402 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037143402 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037143402 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037143402 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related