Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037143500 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,328 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Census tract 06037143500 covers part of the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,328 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1476, -118.4068 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 41%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 74%Grade B
- 3%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.5%Food insecurity
- 6.6%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 15.1%Frequent mental distress
- 21.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
At $2,732 a month, rents run 41% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Cost burden runs 46% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 7.5% against 17.8% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037143500
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143500?
What is the average rent in tract 06037143500?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143500?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143500?
Is tract 06037143500 considered part of Silver Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037143500 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037143500 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037143500 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.