Virgil Village Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 91% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 25%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Set annual rent against average income of $58,202 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Food insecurity runs 25.3% against 17.8% nationally.

Average gross rent is $1,760, 9% below the Los Angeles average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

55% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.