Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037231100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,809 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

06037231100 is a census tract in the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,809. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 50% Stable renters 38% Owners 12%
Tract context
Occupied units658
Renter share88.6%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate38.6%
Median income$46,806

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 18 tracts In Saint James Park
Very High
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#305 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#459 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0152, -118.2766 · click any tract to drill in

Why Saint James Park scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
38.6% poverty · this tract
9.6
Supply constraint
$1,294 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Saint James Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Saint James Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 231100Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park

Food insecurity runs 52.5% against 17.8% nationally. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 9.6/10.

89% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 39%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,294, 33% below the Los Angeles average.

Set annual rent against average income of $46,806 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Disability prevalence runs 48.0% against 31.5% nationally.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037231100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037231100?

Census tract 06037231100 in the Saint James Park neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037231100?

Median gross rent is $1,294/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037231100?

38.6% of residents in tract 06037231100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,809.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037231100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 76th, minority 91th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 06037231100 considered part of Saint James Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037231100 fall within Saint James Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037231100 struggle to pay rent?

About 40.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037231100 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037231100 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037231100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related