Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037243002 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,846 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 06037243002 sits in the Watts area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.3/10. It is home to 2,846 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.3

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 18% Owners 70%

Tract context

Occupied units612

Renter share29.9%

SVI overall0.65

Poverty rate5.3%

Median income$78,029

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9390, -118.2314 · click any tract to drill in

Why Watts scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

5.3% poverty · this tract

1.3

Supply constraint

$2,022 rent vs county FMR

2.7

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Watts compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

92%Socioeconomic
56%Household composition
98%Racial/ethnic minority
8%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
70%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

31.3%Housing insecurity
12.9%Utility-shutoff threat
38.2%Food insecurity
32.5%SNAP enrollment
17.6%Transit barriers
25.4%No health insurance
20.2%Frequent mental distress
40.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Watts

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 40% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

SNAP participation runs 32.5% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Adults with no health insurance runs 25.4% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037243002

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037243002?

Census tract 06037243002 in the Watts neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037243002?

Median gross rent is $2,022/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037243002?

5.3% of residents in tract 06037243002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,846.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037243002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 56th, minority 98th, housing 8th.

Is tract 06037243002 considered part of Watts?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037243002 fall within Watts (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037243002 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037243002 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037243002 scores 9.3/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037243002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 70% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.