Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037274100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,237 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
06037274100 is a census tract in the Golden Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,237 residents. Severe burden reaches 48%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9875, -118.4489 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 4%Grade C
- 71%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Golden Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.3%Food insecurity
- 9.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 4.2%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
71% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
At $3,487 a month, rents run 80% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Annualized rent equals 40% of average household income of $104,643, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The voucher gap is 32.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037274100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037274100?
What is the average rent in tract 06037274100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037274100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037274100?
Is tract 06037274100 considered part of Golden Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037274100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037274100 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037274100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.