Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037274100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,237 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

06037274100 is a census tract in the Golden Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,237 residents. Severe burden reaches 48%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 17% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,046
Renter share58.5%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$104,643

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 9 tracts In Golden Triangle
High
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#819 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#1,110 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,820 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9875, -118.4489 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Triangle scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$3,487 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Golden Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Golden Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.09.0This tracttract 274100Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Golden Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle

71% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

At $3,487 a month, rents run 80% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Annualized rent equals 40% of average household income of $104,643, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The voucher gap is 32.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037274100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037274100?

Census tract 06037274100 in the Golden Triangle neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037274100?

Median gross rent is $3,487/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037274100?

9.5% of residents in tract 06037274100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,237.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037274100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 30th, minority 54th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 06037274100 considered part of Golden Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037274100 fall within Golden Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037274100 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037274100 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037274100 scores 9/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037274100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 71% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related