Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037272201 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,991 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 06037272201 sits in the Golden Triangle area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.2/10. Population here is 1,991. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 38% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units981
Renter share72.7%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$95,446

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Golden Triangle
Very High
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#767 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#1,009 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#1,536 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0004, -118.4341 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Triangle scores 9.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,997 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Golden Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Golden Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.29.2This tracttract 272201Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Golden Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

This is renter territory: 73% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.2/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $1,997, close to the Los Angeles average.

Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $95,446.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037272201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037272201?

Census tract 06037272201 in the Golden Triangle neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037272201?

Median gross rent is $1,997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037272201?

8.8% of residents in tract 06037272201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,991.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037272201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 10th, minority 68th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 06037272201 considered part of Golden Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037272201 fall within Golden Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037272201 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037272201 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037272201 scores 9.2/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037272201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related