Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037272100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,369 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
06037272100 is a census tract in the Golden Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,369. The severe-burden share is 39%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0037, -118.4423 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 44%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 82%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Golden Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.4%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 5.3%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 24.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
At $2,672 a month, rents run 38% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Food insecurity runs 9.4% against 17.8% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 5.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 53% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.
Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $128,125.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037272100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037272100?
What is the average rent in tract 06037272100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037272100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037272100?
Is tract 06037272100 considered part of Golden Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037272100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037272100 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037272100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.