Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally
Emerald Isle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glendale
Tract 06037460700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,102 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 06037460700, home to 5,102 residents in Emerald Isle in Glendale, scores 5.1/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.
About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,468 a month against an average household income of $196,471 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,476
Renter share10.5%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$196,471
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
29
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glendale and the region
Centroid at 34.1929, -118.1988 · click any tract to drill in
Why Emerald Isle scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Glendale
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,468 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
5.0
How Emerald Isle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 59%Racial/ethnic minority
- 4%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 31%Grade A
- 12%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Emerald Isle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.1%Housing insecurity
- 2.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.4%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.3%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 23.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Emerald Isle
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glendale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037460700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037460700?
Census tract 06037460700 in the Emerald Isle neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037460700?
Median gross rent is $2,468/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037460700?
6.3% of residents in tract 06037460700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,102.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037460700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 61th, minority 59th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 06037460700 considered part of Emerald Isle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037460700 fall within Emerald Isle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037460700 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037460700 compare to Glendale overall?
Tract 06037460700 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Glendale at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037460700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Glendale
Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related