Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell

Tract 06037533901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,083 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 06037533901 sits in the Walker area of Bell Gardens, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. It is home to 5,083 residents. 40% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 54% Stable renters 33% Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units1,382
Renter share86.4%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate23.6%
Median income$53,919

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 22 tracts In Walker
High
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 9 tracts In Bell
High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#650 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bell and the region

Centroid at 33.9740, -118.1555 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bell
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.6% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,670 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bell
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bell
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bell
8.4

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 533901Bell: 9.09.0Bellparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10. SNAP participation runs 44.0% against 15.2% nationally.

This is renter territory: 86% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Annualized rent equals 37% of average household income of $53,919, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Adults with no health insurance runs 28.5% against 11.3% nationally. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.4/10.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 9.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037533901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533901?

Census tract 06037533901 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037533901?

Median gross rent is $1,670/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533901?

23.6% of residents in tract 06037533901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,083.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 84th, minority 99th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 06037533901 considered part of Walker?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037533901 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037533901 struggle to pay rent?

About 36.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037533901 compare to Bell overall?

Tract 06037533901 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bell

Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related