Lincoln Eviction Risk: Moderate

35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. At $2,942 a month, rents run 41% over what the rest of Lincoln commands.

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10.

It sits 1.1 points below the Placer County average of 6.2. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.