Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally
Bannockburn Village Eviction Risk: High , Riverside
Tract 06065046501 · Riverside, CA · pop 6,264 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
06065046501 is a census tract in the Bannockburn Village area of Riverside, CA. It scores 8/10 for landlords. 100% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 100%
Stable renters 0%
Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units12
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate100.0%
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
80
th percentile
High
Within county
90
th percentile
High
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Riverside and the region
Centroid at 33.9709, -117.3333 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bannockburn Village scores 8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
100.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverside
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverside
6.5
How Bannockburn Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 79%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Bannockburn Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 33.4%Housing insecurity
- 23.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 56.5%Food insecurity
- 61.8%SNAP enrollment
- 36.6%Transit barriers
- 15.0%No health insurance
- 36.3%Frequent mental distress
- 54.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bannockburn Village
Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 100% of renters here are cost-burdened. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.
Food insecurity runs 56.5% against 17.8% nationally. The poverty rate is 100%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Housing insecurity runs 33.4% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 1.4 points above the Riverside County average of 6.6.
Nationally it ranks #7,836 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 7.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065046501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065046501?
Census tract 06065046501 in the Bannockburn Village neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065046501?
100.0% of residents in tract 06065046501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,264.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065046501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 2th, minority 86th, housing 79th.
Q4
Is tract 06065046501 considered part of Bannockburn Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065046501 fall within Bannockburn Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065046501 struggle to pay rent?
About 33.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065046501 compare to Riverside overall?
Tract 06065046501 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Riverside at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverside eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Riverside
Top eight tracts in Riverside ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Arlanza
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Riverside Junction
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Ramona
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Arlington
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Hunter Industrial Park
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
University
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Belvedere Heights
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Bannockburn Village
8
/ 10 · High
Related