Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Alhambra Triangle Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067001900 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,541 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 7.6/10, tract 06067001900 in the Alhambra Triangle area of Sacramento, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,541 residents. 79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Risk score

7.6

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 47% Owners 21%

Tract context

Occupied units1,924

Renter share78.6%

SVI overall0.64

Poverty rate8.9%

Median income$86,276

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5619, -121.4774 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alhambra Triangle scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Sacramento

8.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

8.9% poverty · this tract

2.2

Supply constraint

$1,613 rent vs county FMR

2.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Sacramento

8.5

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

8.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Sacramento

7.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Sacramento

8.0

How Alhambra Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

64%Socioeconomic
11%Household composition
54%Racial/ethnic minority
90%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
24%Grade B
39%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alhambra Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

13.1%Housing insecurity
7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
13.1%Food insecurity
13.0%SNAP enrollment
8.5%Transit barriers
7.3%No health insurance
19.1%Frequent mental distress
25.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alhambra Triangle

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. 40% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Sacramento County average of 50.2%.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8/10. Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $1,613, 9% below the Sacramento average.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $86,276.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067001900

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067001900?

Census tract 06067001900 in the Alhambra Triangle neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06067001900?

Median gross rent is $1,613/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067001900?

8.9% of residents in tract 06067001900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,541.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067001900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 11th, minority 54th, housing 90th.

Is tract 06067001900 considered part of Alhambra Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067001900 fall within Alhambra Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06067001900 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06067001900 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067001900 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06067001900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.